x

x

Redazione Comitato scientifico Autori Fotografi Partner
Cerca
ABBONAMENTI LOGIN

Il contenzioso interstatale dinanzi alla Corte europea dei diritti umani quale strumento orientato alla tutela dell’interesse collettivo in tempo di pace e di guerra: evoluzione, prassi recente e (non semplici) prospettive di armonizzazione con il diritto umanitario

Inter-State litigation before the European Court of Human Right as a re-discovered tool aimed at protecting and enforcing collective interests in both peace and war time: evaluating strengths and challenges of Article 33 ECHR in light of Strasbourg’s current practice vis-à-vis armed conflicts
Siamo (noi) la più grande tempesta
Ph. Paolo Panzacchi / Siamo (noi) la più grande tempesta

Altri articoli dell'autore

Diritto /

“In search of a way out … of the impunity gap”: l’aggressione militare russa nei confronti dell’Ucraina quale banco di prova per testare l’effettività del diritto (penale) internazionale*

Diritto /

“In search of a way out … of the impunity gap”: l’aggressione militare russa nei confronti dell’Ucraina quale banco di prova per testare l’effettività del diritto (penale) internazionale

Diritto /

Il processo penale cambia ancora: cosa prevede la nuova riforma Cartabia

Continua a leggere l’articolo, accedi o abbonati a Filodiritto.

Abbonati per avere accesso illimitato a tutti i contenuti Premium.

Abbonati
Sei già abbonato? Effettua il Login.

Bürli, N., Third-Party Intervention before the European Court of Human Rights. Amicus Curiae, Member-State and Third Party Interventions, Intersentia/Antwerp, 2017.

Butler, A. S., Legal Aid Before Human Rights Treaty Monitoring Bodies, in International & Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 49, No. 2, 2000, 360-389.

Cançado Trindade, A.A., The Access of Individuals to International Justice, Oxford, 2011.

Decaux, E., The Future of Inter-State Dispute Settlement Within the Council of Europe, in Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1996, 397-410.

Dzehtsiarou, K., Can the European Court of Human Rights Prevent War? Interim Measures in Inter-State Cases, in Public Law, 2016, 254-271.

Dzehtsiarou, K., Catch 22: The Interim Measures of the European Court of Human Rights in the Conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan, in Strasbourg Observers, 9 ottobre 2020, disponibile al seguente indirizzo web: https://strasbourgobservers.com/2020/10/09/catch-22-the-interim-measures-of-the-european-court-of-human-rights-in-the-conflict-between-armenia-and-azerbaijan/#more-4854.

ECtHR: States not party to the European Convention on Human Rights cannot bring cases before the ECtHR, in EU Law Live, 29 ottobre 2020, consultabile al seguente indirizzo web: https://eulawlive.com/ecthr-states-not-party-to-the-european-convention-on-human-rights-cannot-bring-cases-before-the-ecthr/.

Focarelli, C., La persona umana nel diritto internazionale, Bologna, 2013.

Greer, S., What’s Wrong with the European Convention on Human Rights?, in Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 3, August 2008, 680-702.

Haeck, Y., Burbano Herrera, C., Zwaak, L., Strasbourg’s Interim Measures under Fire: Does the Rising Number of State Incompliances with Interim Measures Pose a Threat to the European Convention of Human Rights?, in The European Yearbook of Human Rights, 2011, 375-403, p. 380.

Haeck, Y., Burbano Herrera, C., The Use of Interim Measures Issued by the European Court on Human Rights in Times of War or Internal Conflict, in Buyse, A. (ed.), Margins of Conflict: the ECHR and Transitions to and from Armed Conflict, Series on Transnational Justice, Antwerp, 2011.

Heintze, H.-J., The European Court of Human Rights and the Implementation of Human Rights Standards During Armed Conflicts, in German Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 45, 2002, 60-77.

Helfer, L. R., Redesigning the European Court of Human Rights: Embeddedness as a Deep Structural Principle of the European Human Rights Regime, in The European Journal of International Law, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2008, 125-159.

Heffernan, L., A Comparative View of Individual Petition Procedures under the European Convention on Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, in Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 1, 1997, 78-112.

Ioffe, Y., Case of Georgia v. Russia (I) (Just Satisfaction), App. No. 13255/07, in American Journal of International Law, Vol. 133, No. 3, 2019, 581-586.

Kamminga, M. T., Is the European Convention on Human Rights Sufficiently Equipped to Cope with Gross and Systematic Violations?, in Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, Vol. 12., No. 2, 1994, 153-164.

Klerk, Y., Protocol No. 11 to the European Convention for Human Rights: A Drastic Revision of the Supervisory Mechanism under the ECHR, in Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1996, 35-46.

Koch, J., The Efficacy and Impact of Interim Measures: Ukraine’s Inter-State Application Against Russia, in Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, Vol. 39, No. 1, Article 7, 163-194.

Leckie, S., The Inter-State Complaint Procedure in International Human Rights Law: Hopeful Prospect or Wishful Thinking?, in Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 10, No. 2, 1988, 249-303.

Lemmens, K., Protocol No. 16 to the ECHR: Managing Backlog through Complex Judicial Dialogue?, in European Constitutional Law Review, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2019, 1-23.

Milanovic, M., Georgia v. Russia No. 2: The European Court’s Resurrection of Bankovic in the Contexts of Chaos, in EJIL:Talk!, 25 gennaio 2021, consultabile al seguente indirizzo web: https://www.ejiltalk.org/georgia-v-russia-no-2-the-european-courts-resurrection-of-bankovic-in-the-contexts-of-chaos/.

Orakhelashvili, A., The European Convention on Human Rights and International Public Order, in Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, Vol. 5, 2003, p. 237 e ss., 250-251.

Pellet, A. ‘Human Rightism’ and International Law, in Italian Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2000, 3-16.

Pitea, C., “Articolo 33. Ricorsi interstatali – I. Origini e Sviluppo”, in Commentario breve alla Convenzione europea per la salvaguardia dei diritti dell’uomo e delle libertà fondamentali, in Bartole, S., De Sena, P., Zagrebelsky, Z., (a cura di), Padova, 2012.

Risini, I., Batura, J., Kleinert, L, A ‘golden age’ of inter-state complaints? An interview with Isabella Risini, in Völkerrechtsblog, 16 settembre 2020, consultabile al seguente indirizzo web: https://voelkerrechtsblog.org/a-golden-age-of-inter-state-complaints/

Risini, I., The Inter-State Application under the European Convention on Human Rights: Between Collective Enforement of Human Rights and International Dispute Settlement, Leiden/Boston, 2018.

Risini, I., The Inter-State Application under the European Convention on Human Rights: More Than Diplomatic Protection, in Weiß, N., Thouvenin, J.-M. (eds.), The Influence of Human Rights on International Law, Switzerland, 2016, 69-77.

Rogge K., ‘Inter-State cases under Article 33 of the European Convention on Human Rights’, in Hartig H. (ed.), Trente ans de droit européen des droits de l’homme, Études à la memoire de Wolfgang Strasses, Bruxelles: Bruylant, 2007, 289-306.

Saccucci, A., Le misure provvisorie della Corte europea dei diritti umani nell’ambito della procedura di ricorso interstatale Georgia c. Russia, in Diritto internazionale e diritti umani, Vol. 3, 2009, 129-150.

Stavridi, M., Slovenia v. Croatia: A New Admissibility Criterion for Inter-State Applications under the ECHR?, in EJIL:Talk!, 6 gennaio 2021, disponibile al seguente link: https://www.ejiltalk.org/slovenia-v-croatia-a-new-admissibility-criterion-for-inter-state-applications-under-the-echr/.

Stoppioni, E., Baillet, O., Op-Ed: “Expanding on the Privatisation of the Inter-State Application: the ECtHR’s decision in the Slovenia v. Croatia case”, in EU Law Live, 22 dicembre 2020, disponibile al seguente link: https://eulawlive.com/op-ed-expanding-on-the-privatisation-of-the-inter-state-application-the-ecthrs-decision-in-the-slovenia-v-croatia-case-by-edoardo-stoppioni-and-olivier-baillet/.

Tams C., Individual States as Guardians of Community Interests, in Fastenrath, U., Geiger, R., Khan, D.-E., Paulus, A., Von Schorlemer, S., and Vedder, C. (eds.), From Bilateralism to Community Interests, Essays in Honour of Judge Bruno Simma, Oxford, 2011, 379-405.

Tomuschat, C., Human Rights: Between Idealism and Realism (3rd Edition), Oxford, 2014.

Tzevelekos, P. V., Revisiting the Humanisation of International Law: Limits and Potential, in Erasmus Law Review, Vol. 1, 2013, 62-76.

Van Boven, Th. C., Political and Legal Control Mechanisms: Their Competition and Co-Existence, in Eide, A., Hagtvegt, B., Human Rights in Perspective, Oxford, 1992.

Veermer-Künzli, A., As If: The Legal Fiction in Diplomatic Protection, in The European Journal of International Law, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2007, 37-68.

Articoli più letti su questo argomento

Diritto /

Amministrazione di sostegno  e prodigalità

Diritto /

Benefici penitenziari per i condannati per reati ostativi

Diritto /

La protezione del minore e della donna nel sistema normativo africano

Newsletter Abbonamenti